This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Mon Mar 7 10:08:47 CET 2016
On 05/03/2016 11:34, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:54:45AM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight > wrote: >> Considering the IPv4 space is such a valuable resource now >> I’d happily argue that if you do a bad job of managing it >> then maybe you shouldn’t have it > > You should not forget to add the "and instead I should have it" > at the end. Besides, this discussion is about ERX resources which the NCC > CANNOT take away from their holders, which fact all the screaming > and bickering cannot change. > > Overall, this entire thread is proof of my point that this wg > should not make policy. I may have missed the logic behind this. Any RIPE WG can make policy, why should AA-WG be any different? Brian Brian Nisbet, Network Operations Manager HEAnet Limited, Ireland's Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1 Registered in Ireland, no 275301 tel: +35316609040 fax: +35316603666 web: http://www.heanet.ie/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]