[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Hi guys:

I think I really should make myself clear here.
(Sorry for sending 3 mails in a row as I just realise people are taking to me one by one)

I do not against abuse c or support it, I just don't think it will make much difference. That's all I have to say about abuse c.

However, I do against the idea "if we not managing the internet the gov will step in and take over". The last thing I would want the community is doing the gov's managing job for them. So that's what my last email about.



 



> On 5 Mar 2016, at 08:32, andre at ox.co.za wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 17:55:16 +0000
> Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>> 
>> We are not managing the internet, we are book keeping really.
> [...]
> 
> If you are correct (and imho you are)
> 
> the whole point of book keeping is to have accurate data and records
> 
> so, pick your poison. All POV leads to exactly the same thing: the ncc
> needs accurate abuse-c as much as any of the other data.