[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:41:11AM -0300, Marilson wrote:
> I am also impressed and concerned with the old, inopportune and improper 
> posture of the gentlemen Randy Bush and Gert Doering.

Always happy to impress the young.

WTF?

I've never said people should not handle abuse, or publish abuse contacts
(and if you've ever dealt with us, you know that we take all abuse 
reports very seriously, and of course, our published abuse-c: is read 
and acted upon).

I disagree with implementation details of abuse-c: (namely the mandatory
indirection via an organisation: object) and with the claims that it is
a strict requirement "for the registry functions of the RIPE NCC" - which
it isn't.  The registry needs to know who they have a contract with, and
that's something abuse-c: is orthogonal to - it does not make a difference
either way.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160304/5d50cc5f/attachment.sig>