[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:56:05PM +0200, andre at ox.co.za wrote:
> it is actually very simple: 
> 
> any rigorously correct resource allocation registry data must
> include accurate abuse records.

No.  It needs to contain accurate records of who has been delegated
responsibility for that (admin-c / org).

abuse-c is a way to ease finding the *right* contacts instead of always
having to write paper mail to the company CEO - and that makes sense,
but it's a convenience to operators (as is tech-c), and in no means
required for the function as registry.

Which might conincide with the fact that the paperwork you sign when
opening a LIR has no field for abuse-c...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160303/514f6b27/attachment.sig>