[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:35:49 +0900
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> >> it would be a convenience to me for you to send me €1000/mo, and i
> >> am sure many other sould line up.  let's make it mandatory.
> > can we agree to leave the straw men out of this discussion?  They're
> > not helping.
> no.  even you seem to confuse what is necessary for the ncc to
> maintain a rigorously correct resource allocation registry and what
> is convenient for operators.
> i understamd the former being mandatory.  while i occasionally find a
> good abuse-c: useful, it is not my prerogative to mandate that another
> operator have one for my convenience.
> the ncc's job is a rigorous registry, not a convenience store for ops.
> randy

it is actually very simple: 

any rigorously correct resource allocation registry data must
include accurate abuse records.

otherwise it is hardly: a rigorously correct resource allocation
registry

but more: just a sort of a correct resource allocation registry