[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On 03/03/2016 11:32, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> so the idea is we mandate that there be an abuse-c: so that there is an
>>> email address where we can send mail to which there will be no response?
>>
>> you could just as easily make the same arguments about admin-c or tech-c.
>
> no.  being able to contact them is necessary for the ncc to maintain the
> registry.

It is not necessary to have either an admin-c or tech-c for the NCC to 
maintain the registry. The NCC has it's own internal details of how to 
contact resource holders. The admin-c and tech-c are a convenience for 
other network managers to contact each other. So even you are now 
confused over what is operationally useful and what is for registry 
accuracy.

cheers
denis

>
> randy
>