This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Mar 3 11:23:59 CET 2016
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:10:06 +0900 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >> really? and how does abuse-c affect the effective operation of the > >> ncc resource registry. > > it makes iet easier for the ncc to know who deals with abuse issues > > which includes, but is not limited to: law enforcement (kiddie porn, > > etc etc), the sync of warrants for courts and a few others > they use the real contact information for real contact > i guess it's a different world down there in za > randy I may be in za physically, but the infrastructure of my current employers are in EU, anyway, as you said already it is a convenience for ops to have abuse-c but the point is that it is actually convenient for a whole lot of others (incl me) If your abuse = your person - then you may as well add that person role to abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]