[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:51:03 +0900
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > there has to be accurate records for abuse-c
> really?  and how does abuse-c affect the effective operation of the
> ncc resource registry.
> 
it makes iet easier for the ncc to know who deals with abuse issues
which includes, but is not limited to: law enforcement (kiddie porn,
etc etc), the sync of warrants for courts and a few others

> abuse-c is a convenience for ops.
> 
no, not just ops, .... and, sometimes abuse is a pain (well, it is for some 
and sometimes end up forwarding up and down and being a project manager 
and/or in cc and bcc where one really do not care to be in)

> > many network managers do not respond/reply to abuse, this does not
> > mean that the complaints are not actioned, for example
> > *abuse at google.com is a black hole
> great idea.  i will make my abuse-c:s be blackhole at bogus.com
> 
great, as you said - this is your freedom :)

 > randy