[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

>> so the idea is we mandate that there be an abuse-c: so that there is an
>> email address where we can send mail to which there will be no response?
> 
> The RIPE Database is full of email addresses. If I don't know which one 
> is intended to receive abuse complaints by responsible network managers 
> would you prefer I spam every email address I can find? That was the 
> previous behaviour before we introduced abuse-c.

if the LIR does not want your shotgun blast, they can publish and
abuse-c: and maybe you will use it instead.  or maybe you won't.

>> i am hesitant to mandate behavior beyond that necessary for the ncc
>> to maintain accurate records of resource 'ownership'.  beyond that is
>> me telling someone else how to run their network.
>
> No it is telling someone to manage their networks in a responsible
> manner.

where you define responsibility.  the ncc is not a regulator, it is a
coordinator.  if you want to be told how to run your network by weenie
vigilantes, go to arin.

randy