This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Clayton
richard at highwayman.com
Sat Jun 11 03:41:21 CEST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <8078.1465592669 at server1.tristatelogic.com>, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> writes >Could one or more people here please answer the following simple >question for me? (I've already checked myself but my sources of >information are giving contradictory results/answers.) Although you often see the same result from two different vantage points it is regularly the case that you do not, especially when something wicked is going on. >The question is just this: > >Which (if any) routes within 161.123.0.0/16 are currently being announced >by AS60117? I see AS60117 to be behind AS43350, and they are announcing 161.123.48.0/22 161.123.52.0/22 161.123.56.0/22 161.123.64.0/18 161.123.128.0/18 161.123.192.0/18 Why do you actually ask ? - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBV1tsQTu8z1Kouez7EQIOuwCgjG3YBLNMOjhvMEB+J/k6fNeG7YYAoOdV rqHEJvD1yM1u3LlxXC7YaqTV =+BFD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] simple routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]