[anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:59:47PM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote:

Dear AA-WG

As a kind of post-mortem comment:

> Specifically: forcing people to add an abuse-c as a matter of ticking a
> checkbox leads to not-working or ignored abuse email boxes. And I rather
> have no abuse-c than an ignored one - it is a clear signal and leads to
> much better use of a reporters time.

This argument could be easily extended by making it more general:
forcing people to add any contact including e-mail or phone number could
lead to kind of garbage. Yet, noone oppose to have ORGANISATION, ROLE
and PERSON objects in the database.

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl