[anti-abuse-wg] AS201133

You're kind of like blind now.

It's because they evade taxes. No other reason.

On 07/01/16 15:12, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 30, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>
>> And conversely, why did RIPE, and/or any of its LIRs, deem it appropriate
>> to grant one of RIPE's limited supply of AS numbers to a self-identified
>> *Belizian* company, particularly when this was the company's first,
>> last, and *only* AS number?
> Because, as you pointed out, they have a network presence in the RIPE
> region.
>
>> Wouldn't a LACNIC-issued AS number have
>> done just as well?  If not, why not?
> I am not familiar with LACNIC policies.
>

-- 
Kind regards,
CTO at
*Foton Telecom CJSC*
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator 
<https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861>

http://ipv6actnow.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160701/5046da21/attachment.html>