This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Thu Jan 28 15:29:48 CET 2016
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:06:50AM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: >A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders >in the Abuse-c Policy", is now available for discussion. > >The goal of this proposal is to extend RIPE Document ripe-563, "Abuse >Contact Management in the RIPE Database", to Legacy Internet Resource >Holders. There goes my new year's resolution to not bother with RIPE policy this year. Why in all hells is this proposal in AAWG? This belongs in ncc-services or db-wg! (to be fair, Marco promulgated its existence on the relevant lists but why is everyone subjected to the ordeal of being subscribed to this list?) As for the proposal, I can't see how the NCC could enforce the correctness of this for all legacy resource holders, so it doesn't serve the intended purpose. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 New Policy Proposal (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]