This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Mon Aug 29 07:05:59 CEST 2016
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 06:13:28 +0200 Andre Coetzee <andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > The definition of Internet Abuse seems to be done, can everyone > please have a look and see if there are any final issues? > After another off list comment, the description of 'sanctioned' may require a change. (Big thank you to everyone that has helped me, on and off list) There is still a problem with 'sanctioned' (as originally identified by Gert Doering - as complicated :) ) I do not have any solution or suggestion myself, yet, and will need to think about the problem more... as, what happens when the registrant of an entire TLD authorises the use of that TLD to send spam.... ++++++++++++++ "The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource" (4) Sanctioned An action, event or situation originating from the authoritative holder of rights to a resource that gives permission, or permission is granted by direct implication, which authorises that situation, event or action. +++++++++++++++ Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]