[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>More to the point however, although RIPE NCC may indeed wish, as
>a matter of policy, to refrain from disclosing "non-public
>information", any such policy is obviously, demonstratably, and
>utterly irrelevant to the request I have made.

Your request is off-topic for this WG. The NCC is
content-agnostic and "internet abuse" is not a reason to
terminate a contract and close a LIR.

It also concerns a contractual issue between the RIPE NCC and the
member(s) in question. This is not the business of the RIPE
community or any WG (other than, perhaps, ncc-services)

The NCC has, in the spirit of helpfulness,  shown you some
courtesy in providing certain information - a courtesy that, given
your continued attempts to paint it as either hapless idiots or a
den of thieves, you don't deserve. Even the request for numbers
of closures as well as the answer given were strictly-speaking
off-topic for this WG.

rgds,
Sascha Luck