This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - Terminology used in the definition
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - Terminology used in the definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Fri Aug 19 09:36:36 CEST 2016
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:03:32 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > ox <andre at ox.co.za> wrote: > >(4) Sanctioned > >An action, event or situation originating from the authoritative > >holder of rights to a resource that gives permission, or permission > >is granted by direct implication, which authorises that situation, > >event or action. > <snip> > That fact that you still clearly either can't or won't comprehend that > the "authority" you speak of has to come from somewhere convinces me > that you are now -deliberately- failing to understand. > > Authority for Internet number resources begins at IANA, and then > devolves down to the Regional Internet Registries. The fact that No, with respect, you are wrong. Resources could also be domain names, email addresses, all Internet resources and - all Internet resources already have 'authority' as it has to be delegated, assigned or allocated. very simple, very easy. I think, for the non technical Internet users, this definition may have to define 'authority' ? As, if I am the registrant of a domain name, for example, I have the authority to issue an email address If I am a RIR, same logic Which is why my definition, and terminology definitions, has to "work" technically I received my first spam email in 1987 - even that email fits into the definition I am proposing, I was the victim of an AS fraud, in the early 2000's - even that fits into the definition. My main NetBSD system was hacked in 2002, even that fits into the definition So, please read through all of the terminology, if you think something does not work, do not simply give up, or be worn down - say directly, succinctly, in one paragraph - not long winded, please - as long winded makes it difficult sometimes to grasp the "gist" (right word?) What we have, from what I can tell, is perfectly fine so far: ================= Definition of abuse ================= "The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource" ---------------------------------------------- Terminology used in the definition ----------------------------------------------- (1) Resource Any Internet Resource (2) Use and Usage Any direct or indirect action involving a resource (3) Rights The correct assignment or allocation of a resource by he authoritative holder of such a resource which results in the entitlement to use such an allocated or assigned resource (4) Sanctioned An action, event or situation originating from the authoritative holder of rights to a resource that gives permission, or permission is granted by direct implication, which authorises that situation, event or action. (5) Infringe An action, event or situation which limits, reduces, undermines or encroaches upon the fair use of a resource Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - Terminology used in the definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse - preamble
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]