[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:15:19PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource
> 
> I like this.
> 
> I'm not sure if there are "false positives", but the general idea feels
> good, and thinking about it a bit, it seems to match what I consider 
> "abuse" and does not match "non-abuse" - of course, this is now tied to
> what someone would consider as "infringe upon usage rights".

Thinking about this some more, this doesn't work "as is", because there
are legal reason why someone could infringe on someon else's use rights
- in cases specifically permitted by law.

(Like, you're not permitted to use "force" to infringe on someone else's
"freedom to move" - but there are reasons permitted by law when this is
totally appropriate and not considered "abuse")

Complicated.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160814/243abafe/attachment.sig>