This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Aug 11 23:37:06 CEST 2016
andre at ox.co.za wrote: >similarly - not giving criminals a "heads up" or null routing their >traffic and/or obstructing the functionality of law enforcement, laws >of countries and the rule of law - is not "free speech" For the record, I've _never_ obstructed law enforcement, except in one case where it appeared that there was a non-zero possibility that they might decide to prosecute _me_ for running a honeypot... an act which at least one very senior FBI official publically speculated might possibly be a violation of either the Telecommunications Privacy Act and/or the Stored Communications Privacy Act. With that one exception, law enforcement has pretty consistantly just ignored me, and these days I simply return the favor in kind. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]