This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: dnsbl - trust and other factors
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: dnsbl - trust and other factors
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 58, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Aug 11 21:35:06 CEST 2016
andre at ox.co.za you wrote: >Society does not want to stop spam - if they did - there will be no >spam in 2016. - comments? The words "society" and "stop" as used in the above sentence are both highly ambiguous. 99.9% of all end uers of the Internet *do* want spam stopped. 99.9% of all network operators *do* take steps to block spam from entering their networks. Almost nobody... including even Spamhaus and the other blacklists... routinely take actions which might have some hope of effectively stopping spam at its source. And I don't blame them or anybody else for that. As I've learned, first-hand, over the past 20 years, it is an extremely difficult task for a variety of reasons, almost all of them political or religious rather than technical. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: dnsbl - trust and other factors
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 58, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]