This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 15:57:03 CEST 2016
In the domain world at least, there are 1. A registrar 2. A tld / ccTLD That have oversight over a domain and an abuse management role related to it. If the registrar is not responsive, it is not unknown for the ccTLD or TLD to action a large number of domains related to a persistent / long running issue when it is brought to their attention. Any further action they, or ICANN, later take related to the offending registrar is much rarer – in the case of, for example, Estdomains several years back, that was a famous example. --srs On 11/08/16, 7:00 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Sascha Luck [ml]" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: FWIW, if a LIR is consistently and wilfully creates fraudulent records in the ripedb you can make a complaint and the NCC has sanctions available up to and including closure of the offending LIR. I sincerely hope that this requires a better standard of evidence than "It is self evident that they are evil criminals!!111!"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]