This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Wed Aug 10 22:27:45 CEST 2016
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:27:04PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >I'm still trying to understand. RIPE is *not* RIPE NCC and vise versa, >correct? I mean they are two different things, legally speaking, yes? >A person or legal entity could be a member of "RIPE" and yet not be a >member of "RIPE NCC", correct? Correct. Technically, every internet user is a member of the RIPE community. > Conversely, could a person or legal >entity be a member of "RIPE NCC" and yet _not_ be a member of "RIPE"? Only in theory, really. >Is it correct also that only those persons and legal entities that >are actually paying dues to RIPE NCC are members of RIPE NCC? Yes. Well, those who have a contract, but that involves a membership fee. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]