This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 10:35:51 CEST 2015
The "does not care about" chain is precisely what keeps spammers, phishers and such in perpetual business. "Not in my backyard" on steroids. Oh well, I guess that just means us poor security folks are assured of our jobs not becoming redundant anytime in the foreseeable future. --srs > On 30-Sep-2015, at 1:33 PM, David Hofstee <david at mailplus.nl> wrote: > > Now here is the part that sucks and RIPE does not care much about: The database of RIPE is inaccurate, it definitely is a resource, and does not work very well in (abuse) corner cases. They are not willing to break the abuse chain because they are not willing to police, for whatever reason they (or an individual) name(s). I won’t say that RIPE is the only party not taking responsibility though.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Excuses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]