This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Gannon
james at cyberinvasion.net
Mon Sep 28 23:27:17 CEST 2015
Introduction of fees? -jg On 28/09/2015 21:26, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: >Has there ever been a single decision taken by ICANN which they felt >they could get away with (i.e. without being sued to hell and back) that >WAS NOT in the economic interests of the domain registrars? If so >please describe it, because it will be news to me (and to many others >also, I'm sure).
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]