This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Sep 28 22:46:33 CEST 2015
In message <44C4BAF8-F707-4A2C-816B-52096EF5E0EB at blacknight.com>, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote: >I don't think many registrars are trying to abdicate responsibility You are 100% correct sir. They are not. The word "abdicate" implies that they actually _had_ some responsibility in the first place. But the registrar community had lobbied long and hard to insure that they have never, and will never have any legal liability or responsibility for anything, ever, no matter how bad. So the correct applicable word in this case is not "abdication". It is "avoidance". >As a registrar of record.... Gee! And I was just about to compliment you for your selfless and vocal defence of the poor downtrodden and much msunderstood domain registrars, to which you yourself have no connection. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]