[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10

Gentlemen,

Thank you for the nomination and the answer. So noted.

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG


On 09/10/2015 21:49, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message <55BB79F4004C439393E855B0BC8065F6 at SuperPC>,
> "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to nominate a person for the second chair: meu amigo Ronald F.
>> Guilmette (friend for one more day).
>
> While I appreciate this unexpected (and largely unearned) vote of
> confidence, unfortunately I find it necessary to quote a man whose
> actual accomplishments actually did warrant his consideration for
> high office:
>
> 	"If nominated I will not run; if elected I will not serve."
> 					-- William Tecumseh Sherman
>
> (I might actually be tempted to volunteer for the position is question,
> but given that I am not physically present anywhere within the RIPE
> geographical region, I feel sure that even if relevant bylaws permitted
> it, I would be committing a serious disservice to the entire WG if I
> were to make any pretense of fulfilling the role in question, e.g. by
> merely "phoning it in", so to speak.)
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
>
> P.S.  Thanks largely to absoluely everybody on this mailing list, I was
> compelled to do the research and to find my own answers to the two key
> questions that I posted here the other day.  The clear implications of
> what I found (in the ICANN 2013 RAA) are, I would say, worse than disturbing,
> about which I will have more to say later on.
>
> What I found does raise one other question however... which I will post
> here now in the complete expectation of the exact same level of helpful
> responsiveness which you all accorded to my last two questions:
>
> When the exact wording of the 21013 RAA was being negotiated... by
> ICANN, sitting across the table from such other "stakeholders" as the
> Registrars Committee... who exactly was the lead negotiator for ICANN's
> side of the table?
>