This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 15:45:37 CET 2015
A domain may expire in a year and then be recycled - registered by someone else, usually a domainer. On the other hand if someone takes the trouble to get a prefix, an ASN, transit / peering and such I dare say he won’t give up the prefix all that easily (barring accidents such as going out of business) The bar is much higher because 1. Far fewer prefixes than domains, by orders of magnitude 2. A single prefix can have thousands of domains hosted on it - sort of aggregating things very conveniently, abuse handling wise. —srs > On 17-Nov-2015, at 7:09 PM, Gilles Massen <gilles.massen at restena.lu> wrote: > > - under point 4 it says implicitly that name-based whois is quicker > outdated than number-based whois. Is there any hard data to back that > statement up?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Sources of Abuse Contact Info For Abuse Handlers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]