This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Nov 7 00:34:46 CET 2015
>>> The following RIR IRR's are in use today: RIPE, APNIC, AfriNIC, ARIN. >> most operators in X do not register routes in irrX for all X except RIPE > Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here. most folk in non-ripe regions do not use their rir's irr instance. > I know my employer uses the rr.ntt.net instance on a daily basis. yes, i built that and heas has done cool stuff. does your employer register in ARIN or APNIC irr? < light goes on? > randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]