This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Nov 6 23:46:47 CET 2015
> The following RIR IRR's are in use today: RIPE, APNIC, AfriNIC, ARIN. most operators in X do not register routes in irrX for all X except RIPE > I do not agree with "most rir irr instances are unused". cool. maybe you could back your disagreement up with measurement. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]