[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)

> On 7 Nov 2015, at 23:24, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
> 
> I only mentioned it because (a) the Wikipedia entry relating to
> this goes into some lengthy... and interesting... discussion of
> the various complexities introduced when third parties are named
> in contracts and also because (b) in my experience, statues and
> regulations found useful in one jurisdiction are often also
> adopted in others, and thus, the Act in question may perhaps
> have some sort of counterpart in Dutch law, even though that
> might be radically different in both scope and implications.

Dutch law is based on Napoleonic  Law, English Law is based on Common Law,  you would be better finding an example from the former rather than the latter which to be polite is some what random being driven by case law rather than principles. 

	f