This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 18:20:14 CET 2015
A bit of a correction here. They’re all one of these three (with the vast majority being in #1) 1. Victims of crime / fraud - and get to pay for all the security required to block it and to ensure that their customers remain secure + don’t abuse services 2. Victims of crime / fraud who can’t - or don’t want to - invest in such security 3. Other outfits that see a profit motive in providing services to abusers Still, they are part of a rather large and heavily abused ecosystem - called the Internet. —srs > On 06-Nov-2015, at 10:44 PM, Sascha Luck [ml] <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: > > Uhuh. I guess it's just as well that barely any operators seem to read > this list. They may be less than happy to learn that they are all > criminals.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]