This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Nov 6 00:35:02 CET 2015
In message <20151105214840.GU47126 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: >On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:31:31PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>>1) All resource holders are presumed to be bad actors and all of >>>their data must be kept in a database, their correctness to be >>>strictly enforced. >> >>I am sure that your view is sincerly held, carefully considered, >>and shared by at least some, and perhaps many other RIPE members, >>but... >> >>I really would like to be there with a video camera the next time >>you find yourself having to go through airport security. > >This is an argument? The NCC should be like airport security? No. Ideally, I would like to see RIPE strike some appropriate and reasonable balance between airport security and "Lord of The Flies". >From where I sit however, I see more parallels with the latter than the former. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]