This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Nov 5 22:31:31 CET 2015
In message <20151104143230.GK47126 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: >No. Just NO. I am, frankly, flabbergasted at this mindset: > >1) All resource holders are presumed to be bad actors and all of >their data must be kept in a database, their correctness to be >strictly enforced. I am sure that your view is sincerly held, carefully considered, and shared by at least some, and perhaps many other RIPE members, but... I really would like to be there with a video camera the next time you find yourself having to go through airport security. YouTube stardom awaits us. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]