This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Whois database verification
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database verification
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database verification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Nov 5 03:14:03 CET 2015
In message <trinity-3126151d-dac9-44e0-9cfc-1b10fd3b8725-1446576476140 at 3capp-gm x-bs01>, "Karl-Josef Ziegler" <kjz at gmx.net> wrote: >Several years ago I already got a postcard with a verification code to prove >that my postal address is correct. And this was not a paid service but a large >freemailer with thousands of customers. So, no it's not rocket science and >yes it was already done this way in large quantities (by another service >provider). I was going to mention this possibility, i.e. of doing real verification of snail-mail addresses, but I decided not to. Given some of the reactions to even just phone verification, it seemed to me predictable that there would be much public gnashing of teeth and tearing of hair in response to even the suggestion. (That would predictably be followed by fervent objections of the basis of cost, which would themselves just as predictably be followed by objections on the basis of "privacy" and/or unworkability. I feel sure that someone would say that if the magic cookies needed to complete the validation were printed on the OUTSIDE of the postcards, then any mailman or anyone else who happened to see the postcard in transit could then maliciously, and with malice aforethought, sadistically and surrepitiously complete the validations on behalf of the actual parties to whom the postcards were addressed. The fact that no apparent benefit would actually accrue to any man-in-the-middle who actually did this would probably get lost in the ensuing kerfuffle.) For now, I personally would be happy if each snail-mail address was just simply checked to make sure that it refers to some address on this planet. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database verification
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Whois database verification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]