This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 21:18:27 CET 2015
Do you feel that the numbers community comparing notes with the ICANN whois EWG would help? https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-09-25-en > On 05-Nov-2015, at 1:32 AM, denis <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Seriously, with a review of the data model we can end up with: > -a lot less personal data in the database > -contact data more relevant to the purpose > -relevant contacts only visible to the groups of people who need it > -chain of trust in organisations who manage the data > -verification done closer to the data source > -more accurate and more trusted and better protected contact data
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]