This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue Nov 3 14:49:18 CET 2015
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 07:13:17PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >I would actually prefer any such proposal to come from within >the regular RIPE community, rather than from one of us >outsiders. For once I agree completely. If this goes to an actual proposal, this needs to be in APWG as it would be: a) address policy b) affecting the entire community Any contractual changes will also need membership approval via GM vote anyway. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]