This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue Nov 3 14:42:48 CET 2015
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:28:03PM +0100, David Hofstee wrote: >In that line of thought: I would like email validation on a >regular basis. There are so many email addresses that do not >work properly (what then is the sense of registering invalid >data?). There are LIRS that register many thousands of objects. Even small LIRs can have many hundreds. Is the idea that they employ someone full-time to solve captchas for the NCC (another idea from this discussion)? Frankly, I'd rather have the spam, at least I can filter that. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]