This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue Nov 3 03:42:33 CET 2015
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:06:56AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >It needn't be done except as an additional verification step for >new asns and suspect ones Sigh. Having an ASN assigned involves exchange of signed contracts between sponsoring LIR and end-user. These, as well as company registration papers or passport copies(!) have to be approved by the NCC before assignment takes place. Exactly *what* purpose would a phone call or fax (why not TELEX if we're doing retro tech?) serve? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]