[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c cleanup

+1
I’d assume most do at this stage – it would be good to get confirmation of same

Regards

Michele


--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

http://www.blacknight.host/

http://blog.blacknight.com/

http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage

http://www.technology.ie

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Social: http://mneylon.social

Random Stuff: http://michele.irish

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: denis walker
Reply-To: denis walker
Date: Tuesday 5 May 2015 14:59
To: "anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net<mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>"
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c cleanup

Hi All

When the original implementation plan was put forward for "abuse-c:", the time line (if I remember correctly) was:
-allowing 6 months to deploy to all members allocations
-then 12 months to deploy to all independent resources
-then do a cleanup

The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:" in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the database.

I think it is time to schedule that cleanup.

Can the RIPE NCC confirm that all resources now have an "abuse-c:"?

cheers
Denis Walker
Independent Netizen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20150505/da26d6dc/attachment.html>