This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Nov 17 23:51:50 CET 2014
In message <20141117224139.GA91687 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:55:10PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>% Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled obje >cts. >>% Access from your host has been temporarily denied. >>% For more information, see >>% >>http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-db/why-did-you-receive-the-error-20 >1-access-denied > >This is a limit on "person:" objects, NCC's idea of data >protection. Apparently. >Don't think you'd like my solution for this though, I wouldn't >allow anyone who isn't a) identifiable and b) contracted access >to personally identifying data. I would be perfectly OK with (a). In fact, accessing this service only via individual password-protected accounts seems to me to be the only rational way to _actually_ protect the data from mass harvesting. Regarding (b) I would be OK with that too, as long as the contract in question required me to pay only zero dollars... er... I mean zero euros. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]