This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Nov 7 04:41:20 CET 2014
In message <-827564976827469824 at unknownmsgid>, Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: >if you would be interested in the RIPE policies (and not only noise on this >mailing list), you would have followed the discussions happening during the >RIPE Meeting today; there was a lenghty discussion at the routing wg about >this particular case and similar cases in general. Would it be possible for you, or anyone else who attended to provide a brief summary of the discussion at that meeting, for the benefit of those of us who were not able to attend? If so, that would be greatly appreciated. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]