[anti-abuse-wg] Final Draft Version - Appointment & Removal of AA-WG Chairs

Gilles,

Yes, it my hope that the will of the WG, as expressed through the 
mailing list, will be made clear on this.

Brian
Gilles Massen wrote, On 04/11/2014 15:28:
> Brian,
>
> Without wanting to argue on the local presence for the election, I
> wanted to know whether you think if the chair-selection-process should
> be considered a kind of policy (and thus be decided consensus based on
> the mailing list), or rather something to be managed under the authority
> of the chair? Or in-between? (...and no, I'm not proposing a PDP to
> define the process for selecting a process for choosing WG chair - this
> is not ICANN after all...)
>
> best,
> Gilles
> (who is slightly annoyed for having to chose between MAT-wg and
> anti-abuse-wg...)
>
>
> On 4/11/2014, 15:04 , Brian Nisbet wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> Apologies for the long delay on this, here is some very slightly revised
>> text. It hasn't diverged much from the text of the 26th of September,
>> but I've taken into account a number of comments that were made,
>> especially around language.
>>
>> It is still my intention, at least initially, to limit this to the
>> people in the room at a WG session at a RIPE meeting, but obviously this
>> is up to the WG, so we can discuss this tomorrow.
>>
>> **************
>