This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Tue Jun 3 22:12:51 CEST 2014
It's been pointed out to me (thanks Leo!), that the WG is called Anti-Spam below. This is a mistake, to clarify, we're still very much the Anti-Abuse WG. Brian On 3 June 2014 17:12:49 GMT+01:00, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >Colleagues, > >Having taken on board a number of points, here is another draft of >this. >I think we've got the kinks knocked out, so to speak, or at least >reached a point where rough consensus may be manageable. I'm going to >set a deadline of 15:00 UTC +1 on Friday 6th June to end this round of >discussions. Obviously if something needs to be discussed beyond that, >it can, but we've been talking about this for a couple of weeks now. > >Importantly while I'd like some statements of support, silence, at this > >point, will be taken to indicate consent. > >Please see the draft below, > >Brian > >********************************** > >As the Internet has evolved, so has the scope and scale of network >abuse. Unsolicited bulk email (spam) is often merely a symptom of >deeper abuse such as viruses or botnets. Consequently the Anti-Spam >Working Group has a wide scope, to include all relevant kinds of abuse. > >The technical details of spam and other abuse constantly vary, in terms > >of application channel and technique. Channel examples include SMTP, >SIP, XMPP and HTTP. Examples of techniques range from buffer overrun >to >social engineering. > > Within scope are all systems and mechanisms, both technical and >non-technical, that are used to create, control, and make money from, >such abuse. > > While areas such as hosting illegal content or copyright >infringement are not seen as a central part of the working group's >remit, they are unquestionably bound up in other aspects of network >abuse and, as such, may be areas of interest. > >The working group considers both technical and non-technical aspects of > >abuse, with the following goals: > > Produce and continue to update a BCP (Best Common Practice) >document for ISPs similar in nature to RIPE-409 but covering a wider >range of possible abusive behaviours. > > Provide advice (beyond that of the BCP) to relevant parties >within the RIPE region such as ISPs, Governments and Law Enforcement >Agencies on strategic and operational matters. > > Discuss and disseminate information on technical and >non-technical methods of preventing or reducing network abuse. -- Brian Nisbet Network Operations Manager, HEAnet (Sent from a mobile device, apologies for brevity) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20140603/18ce259b/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]