This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] contradictory abuse contacts and some stats
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] contradictory abuse contacts and some stats
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call for feedback on 2013-01: Openness about Policy Violations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Oct 17 16:14:38 CEST 2013
Frank, This was discussed this afternoon in the WG Session, not sure if you were watching or not? Frank Gadegast wrote, On 17/10/2013 08:48: > > Hi, > > we realize more and more networks having an abuse-c now, but > also realize that most networks now have contradictory abuse email > addresses spreaded in between new abuse contacts or old remarks or > abuse-mailbox-fields. > > Might be a good idea to contact alls memmbers and LIR again to fix their > records now ... The NCC stated, and I agree with them, that they don't think it's a good idea to add another round of mails on top of all the ones they have sent and all the ones they're going to send to people in the next phase of this project. The WG seemed happy to let the project proceed as planned and review what further communications are required after those phases. Thanks, Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] contradictory abuse contacts and some stats
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call for feedback on 2013-01: Openness about Policy Violations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]