This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart - inetnum: 134.105.0.0 - 134.105.255.255
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart - inetnum: 134.105.0.0 - 134.105.255.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart - inetnum: 134.105.0.0 - 134.105.255.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri May 10 21:28:35 CEST 2013
* Reza Farzan: > This case reminds me of my previous inquiry about a Network without contact, > even an important institution such as Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart. "Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart" is not a real organization. The organization is actually called "Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.". This document even states that its subdivisons and sub-organizations usually aren't legal persons in their own right: <http://www.mpi-stuttgart.mpg.de/2327/imprint> <abuse at belwue.de> should be able to fix things pretty quickly. DFN-NOC probably as well. (If DFN-CERT actually felt responsible, surely there'd by an IRT object pointing to them.)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart - inetnum: 134.105.0.0 - 134.105.255.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Max-Planck-Institute Stuttgart - inetnum: 134.105.0.0 - 134.105.255.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]