This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Mar 15 18:35:51 CET 2013
On 16 Mar 2013, at 06:08, Arnold wrote: > Without ongoing efforts to verify and costs to the client for failing to respond, all of this possibly keeps some people busy, but does nothing to help stem SPAM. Brownie points à la SixXs to qualify for a more attractive charging band, or? Just wondering ... /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]