This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Tue Mar 12 00:50:42 CET 2013
Hi Arnold, > Since I have been reporting SPAM for some time, missing, out-of-date > or inaccurate contact information has always been a problem. Absolutely agree. That is one part of the data accuracy part we want to face now. > A number of contact addresses are listed as some public general mail > server such as gmail, hotmail etc. All of those are pretty much > useless. Since RIPE registers the actual user, it should insist on a > usable contact address at the registering organization. Same here. Topic on the agenda as well. > In addition, if this issue is taken seriously, then RIPE ought to > provide a means of reporting 'abuse' by the registering organization > of this feature. There are several things that can be done easily to increase data accuracy and others that are more complex. I think abuse-c will already increase data accuracy significantly, but yes, we need to figure out ways to increase and keep up data quality. Lets go step by step and make things happen. All this is definitively on our agenda in the near future. Thanks for your feedback. Tobias
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Reporting Issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]