[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66

In message <51372538.60604 at hovland.cx>, 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Hovland?= <jorgen at hovland.cx> wrote:

>  On 03/06/13 11:48, Brian Nisbet wrote:
>> Ronald,
>> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote the following on 05/03/2013 20:36:
>>> I'd like to just reiterate my view that all other activities of this WG
>>> will be utterly fruitless until such time as a reasonable, rational, and
>>> generally accepted definition of "abuse" is in hand.
>>
>> I genuinely don't think it will be useful to spend time on this. I 
>> think an attempt to get a consensual definition of abuse would take 
>> the whole of the session in Dublin and every session thereafter and 
>> after all that time, I still don't think we would have got anywhere. 
>> If the rest of the WG disagrees with me, then we can raise it, but if 
>> n = the number of people in the WG, I fear we would have n + 1 
>> definitions.
>
>I am pretty sure it will take until the end of the world to agree on a 
>definition. Perhaps even longer.


      "And when the broken hearted people, living in the world agree,
      there will be an answer, let it be."
						-- Paul McCartney