This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Mar 5 21:36:30 CET 2013
In message <5135CE73.9030500 at heanet.ie>, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: >This is the draft agenda for the RIPE 66 meeting... No agenda item about defining (or refining the definition of) "abuse"? I'd like to just reiterate my view that all other activities of this WG will be utterly fruitless until such time as a reasonable, rational, and generally accepted definition of "abuse" is in hand. Regards, rfg P.S. I am still not sure if any other things that drew me to this mailing list, or to this WG, or that I have reported here, over time, are or are not considered abuse. (And by that I mean "formally" considered.)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Agenda - RIPE 66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]