[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye

Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message<51CE9C11.50107 at powerweb.de>, you wrote:
>
>> But: those netblocks have been given to the resource holders
>> under the regulations of that time.
>> Do you really want to change the regulations now, to take
>> resources "back" ?
>
> When the space is being demonstratably used for snowshoe spamming
> and/or for "blackhat SEO" purposes (which are also fundamentally
> anti-social), yes, I do.

Good.

Now we know, that LIRs should only give resources away,
when the usage is clearly defined and does not change,
I like to ask:

- is an LIR forced by any RFC or RIPE regulation
   to control the usage later on ?

RIPE seems to only take care, that the address of
an LIR is ok, its still the same company, the company
exists and the resources are put into the RIPE db aso:

- but does the RIPE NCC also checks the usage of
   all resources and if the LIR controls the usage
   of those resources during an audit process ?
   how can a LIR proove to the RIPE NCC that
   the initial purpose is still the same ?

- can RIPE NCC force an LIR legally to withdraw a
   specific network not used for its initial purpose ?
- and can RIPE NCC withdraw the complete allocation
   of this LIR if he does not ?

Could someone please name the excact phrase of an RFC
or other RIPE NCC document or contract.

If there is none, should that not be our next proposal ?


Kind regards, Frank
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================