This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benedikt Stockebrand
bs at stepladder-it.com
Fri Jun 28 12:18:42 CEST 2013
Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> writes: > Sad, but how can you submit a death threat to a role persons (object) ? As e-mail. >> If you make looking up the admin-c for an address as easy as some people > > No, not the admin-c, the abuse contact email addresses, that are > already published ... Sorry, that was a typo. Same problem, however. > Only the abuse email address published by the ISPs or resource holder > will be available. > Its up to every resource holder to publish, what he thinks whats accurate. > Usally a role address like abuse at sitename.de or so ... The reason why I am so wary about this is because at that time you'd have to have a real person, with name and phone number, listed as admin-c. Things have improved since then, partly due to the introduction of abuse-c. Nevertheless, the actual problem with the idea about abuse-c being too easily accessible still remains: People who don't really know what they are doing will find that interface and cause additional work to the people on the receiving end of the abuse-c mail queue. -- Business Grade IPv6 Consulting, Training, Projects Benedikt Stockebrand, Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]